Different approaches to web marketing: visiting York

28 09 2010

This summer we went to York for two days (one night). Looking for a nice but cheap accommodation in the city centre we found a nice Hostel – The Fort Boutique. It was open from just three weeks, but there was a good amount of information on the web: facebook, twitter and a blog. It had especially a good rating on hostelworld and travellerspoint with many reviews. They’ve started their web marketing before it was open, starting from Twitter and Facebook accounts and posting pictures of the work in progress.
IMG_3154
When we arrived we had to go at Kennedy’s bar, just beside the Hostel, to check in and drop the baggage (only a small one, but still..). The Hostel was very nice, still with some works on the way to be finished, but the welcome was warm from the Duty Manager, the cleanliness was perfect, the environment gave an idea of youngness and we were very happy. Until the night (!). The problem wasn’t what we were expecting (noise coming from the road –  as other comments reported online), but the bathroom in the room didn’t have a door (yet) but only a curtain and the fan in it was on for 1 hour after you’d switched off the light. Of course the first thing we thought was that, being the room an “artistic room” probably the artist arranged the toilet to be like that. But that wouldn’t explain how I could have scratched my hand on a sharp tile by the door frame. So definitely a door was in plan to be put there. Too much hurry in opening before the York Races going on that very week-end and the Hostel wasn’t finished.

Definitely the web marketing strategy the Hostel had was paying back. It was fully booked and had (and has) an excellent rating online. The blog is updated at least once a month (answering customer questions and complaints) and the facebook page at least every ten days (not much though).

To find something to eat for dinner that night hasn’t been very easy. Every nice restaurant we had advised on the guide (and checked online) was fully booked or with a table at 6 pm (too early for us) or by the toilet door (not a very nice place where to eat: I wonder why you place a table there!). But, while walking in the city center, we came across a nice looking restaurant Kuja Lounge. It didn’t look expensive and seemed to have a nice choice on the evening menu.

Problem: we couldn’t find any information about it online. Not even the official website was  coming up on Google.  Time was running low (around 5 pm – late to book a table in UK) so we decided to take the chance and book a table for two at 8.30. When the owner (or the manager, I don’t know) opened the restaurant diary it was pretty much empty. We were scared for sure. If a restaurant is good, in a week-end where York has about half a million visitors you expect it to be full. But we were wrong.

Kuja Lounge is a very nice restaurant where very good food is served and attention to details and to the customer are given. There were about 8 tables in when we arrived including a table of 10 people (noisy) and there were 1 bar tender and 3 waiting on staffs. We had to wait some minute before they could have taken the order but the waitresses were always kind and apologizing for the delay. Water came even before we could have ordered it, just to give us something for the waiting time (10-15 minutes… nothing!). We really enjoyed the evening.

IMG_3416

Kuja doesn’t have a web marketing strategy and we decided to go there only because more popular restaurants (online and on the touristic guide) were too busy. It definitely has a good product and is in a very central position (even if a bit hidden). But its positioning online is poor and that affects the business. In the long-term I’m sure that the word of mouth will do. But how many customers has it lost during the years that it will take? When we went to Kuja it was open from just 3 months. But the hostel web strategy proved us that the customer relation is built even before you open.





Territorial Web Marketing: how destinations are promoted on Facebook

27 04 2010

Alright, I don’t like too much Facebook. But it is true that is one of the most important vehicle of information and it’s easier to keep conversations on it than Twitter (not than FriendFeed, but is not so diffused). And so it’s easier to stimulate UGC among tourists and residents.

This morning I was watching different tourism organizations doing their “job” on Facebook: Wales (from Visit Wales), Spain (from Spain.info), Italia (perhaps from the tourism ministry, but absolutely not sure, there are no links what so ever) and Riviera delle Palme (from the Tourism promotion service of Savona). First difference that comes to the eye is the language: English for Wales (“of course!” somebody would say, but is not so obvious), English and Spanish for Spain (!), English and a bit of Italian for Italia, and just Italian for Riviera dell Palme that of course have a smaller organization, but not less important I would say. There’s not much Welsh in the Wales page, there’s a lot of Spanish but almost everything is in both languages in Spain and there’s not much English in the Italia page, where seems that the most important thing is to catch fans and post pictures. And here comes another difference, definitely more interesting: contents.

Wales and Spain try to communicate with their “fans” (tourists, residents, lovers) not just telling them how nice is the country or what to do, but trying to generate contributes: a two ways communication, where the tourism organization listens to the stake holders and share their contribution. I really like it. I can see a nice picture and think “oh, I really want to go there” just like we all  do when we see a travel agency window, or I can read  what people say and think “I really like people from that country” and there, I think, I will go. Residents are one of the attractive factors for a touristic destination. There can be lots of shows, events fairs, but people make of a destination attractive. On both pages most of the pictures are from other people who not just comment but mainly contribute.

Italia  has lots of pictures on its page, and as far as I’ve checked, there’s no request of pictures, news, “what to do” to the followers, just “please add us as fan, and share it with your friends!”, that sounds really “spammy”.

Riviera delle palme is a small reality. The area that it represents is small compared to the others. But still is an area that could generate good flows of tourists and has lost attractiveness with foreign tourism. So publishing in english could be a good thing and definitely needs to focus more on the communication among tourists, more than advertise a single event like a new web site or the participation to a tourism fair.

Last difference that I’d like to mention is the connection trough the Facebook page and who manage it: Wales posts many links to their VisitWales blog or a specific VisitWales web page. Spain mainly to their website. Riviera delle palme sends its visitors to friends website, most of them related to events. I couldn’t find any link in the Italia page.

Now: I know we have the most beautiful country in the world (as it’s written 10 thousands times in the Facebook page) but what if nobody comes to visit it?! Just repeating it doesn’t make attractive. Pictures are nice, but not lived. They don’t show how nice can be to spend some time in Italy. Who has done it can.

Concluding: I really like Visit Wales work (not a big news!). I do like how Spain approaches the tourism web marketing. Riviera delle Palme needs to improve, but seems on the good way. Italia needs to show first who manages the Facebook page, then we can say what could be done.





Facebook e i “piccoli” media

21 09 2009
Notavo come FB abbia dato la possibilità ai “piccoli” media di raggiungere le masse.
Per esempio questa mattina leggo una nota di un mio contatto su una notizia relativa al vaccino antinfluenzale e allo stato di pandemia diramato dall’OMS. La nota è tratta da un articolo di un giornale online (EFFEDIEFFE) del quale io non avevo mai sentito parlare.
Cerco così sul sito informazioni sulla casa editrice e scopro che è un’azienda tutto sommato giovane (dal 1991) di marcato orientamento cattolico (caratteristica che contraddistingue il mio contatto in effetti), come essa stessa si definisce sul “chi siamo” del sito.
Magari definirla una casa editrice di nicchia è esagerato (non penso sia effettivamente così piccola), ma molta gente non avrebbe mai letto un articolo scritto su una rivista di una casa editrice cattolica se non fosse stato linkato su FB. Probabilmente molti di quelli che hanno letto l’articolo non si sono nemmeno posti la domanda di chi abbia scritto l’articolo e dove fosse pubblicato se non su FB. Magari qualcuno di quelli che l’ha letto si sarebbe addirittura rifiutato di leggerlo se avesse saputo chi lo pubblicava (con un atteggiamento per niente saggio, tra l’altro).
E invece tramite FB le notizie si diffondono in maniera più veloce siano queste vere, false, esagerate, allarmiste o semplicemente burle.
Pur essendo vero quello che riporta anche Zambardino su Repubblica, ossia che le persone tendono a raggrupparsi per interessi comuni e affinità (che questo possa essere usato anche a fini di marketing, lecito o meno che possa sembrare) e che quindi le informazioni tendono a diffondersi all’interno di cerchi, è pur vero che i vari e differenti cerchi sono connessi tra di loro per mezzo della moltiplicità di interessi che ogni persona ha. Ecco quindi che anche chi scrive per un ristretto gruppo di persone (tanto ristretto in questo caso non lo è, lo ammetto) ha la possibilità di essere letto e diffuso all’esterno del proprio cerchio.
Il passaparola funzonava già in assenza di internet e dei social cosi, ma con la loro diffusione è diventato più semplice, liberandolo dalle costrizioni mentali che si potevano avere.